Lee Bell
2006-08-04 12:23:44 UTC
In an exhaustive study, lasting over 40 years and involving thousands of
hours of diving, the relationship between air, nitrox and DCS is finally
clarified. Study results are as follows:
- Diving air, as air, within the limits of air tables, is completely safe.
In thousands of test dives, at depths covering the entire range normally
referred to as "recreational limits," absolutely no incidents of DCS were
noted.
- Diving air, as air, within the limits of pre gradient bubble computers is
almost completely safe. In thousands of test dives, at depths covering the
entire range normally referred to as "recreational limits," only one
suspected incident of DCS was noted. Incidents aggregate less than one .05
percent (.0005), a statistically insignificant number of suspected
incidents. It should be noted that the one suspected incident occurred at
the extreme limit of recreational depths and at extreme limit of the
computer's recommended profiles. In light of other results, it is likely
that at least one, and perhaps more, manufacturers of early dive computers,
failed to correctly identify the point at which some DCS risk occurs.
- Diving air, as air, within the limits of more conservative modern
computers, is completely safe. Absolutely no incidents of DCS were noted.
It is further noted that the profile responsible for the one suspected
incident of DCS experienced with an older computer, was not within profiles
recommended by modern computers. It is likely that safeguards added to even
the least conservative of modern computers have adequately addressed issues
with older, less conservative models.
- Diving nitrox, as nitrox, within the limits of modern nitrox capable
computers, is completely safe. Absolutely no incidents of DCS were noted.
Researcher's note:
1. No data is available for dives using nitrox, using nitrox tables. For
information on this subject, users are directed to studies performed by
other research groups including WKPP, GUE, DIR and Magilla.
2. Due to budget constraints, no data is available for diving nitrox as air.
Since diving air as air and nitrox as nitrox, researchers concluded that
there is no cost benefit to this practice. Rumors that the practice is
"safer" or "more conservative" are made moot by the fact that it is simply
not possible to be safer than 100% safe.
Lee Bell 2006-08-04
hours of diving, the relationship between air, nitrox and DCS is finally
clarified. Study results are as follows:
- Diving air, as air, within the limits of air tables, is completely safe.
In thousands of test dives, at depths covering the entire range normally
referred to as "recreational limits," absolutely no incidents of DCS were
noted.
- Diving air, as air, within the limits of pre gradient bubble computers is
almost completely safe. In thousands of test dives, at depths covering the
entire range normally referred to as "recreational limits," only one
suspected incident of DCS was noted. Incidents aggregate less than one .05
percent (.0005), a statistically insignificant number of suspected
incidents. It should be noted that the one suspected incident occurred at
the extreme limit of recreational depths and at extreme limit of the
computer's recommended profiles. In light of other results, it is likely
that at least one, and perhaps more, manufacturers of early dive computers,
failed to correctly identify the point at which some DCS risk occurs.
- Diving air, as air, within the limits of more conservative modern
computers, is completely safe. Absolutely no incidents of DCS were noted.
It is further noted that the profile responsible for the one suspected
incident of DCS experienced with an older computer, was not within profiles
recommended by modern computers. It is likely that safeguards added to even
the least conservative of modern computers have adequately addressed issues
with older, less conservative models.
- Diving nitrox, as nitrox, within the limits of modern nitrox capable
computers, is completely safe. Absolutely no incidents of DCS were noted.
Researcher's note:
1. No data is available for dives using nitrox, using nitrox tables. For
information on this subject, users are directed to studies performed by
other research groups including WKPP, GUE, DIR and Magilla.
2. Due to budget constraints, no data is available for diving nitrox as air.
Since diving air as air and nitrox as nitrox, researchers concluded that
there is no cost benefit to this practice. Rumors that the practice is
"safer" or "more conservative" are made moot by the fact that it is simply
not possible to be safer than 100% safe.
Lee Bell 2006-08-04